2 Comments
User's avatar
Steven Curtis's avatar

It is a dangerous precedent to start restricting certain religious buildings. However, if Mosques are used for another purpose than religion, then enforce the existing laws that are there to minimize the effect of military intents for these buildings. All they have to do to avoid a "anti-Mosque" statute is to call them "Christian Churches" or "Nondenominational Churches". If you want to stop sharia law and usurpation of our liberties, do it in such a way that it does not restrict those liberties. It may sound good to "restrict Mosques", but, by doing so, you are restricting big chunks of our liberty.

john's avatar

So, who is getting paid off in Texas?... Remember the Alamo has seemed to lose its edge with today's threats. We are watching a Soft Coup in real time....